That right there is the cruddy reality of our nation that ALL OF US have had to, at one point or another, learn to come to grips with. Once we have, however, things within our infrastructure really do start to take on a different appearance.
For this reason, Musk has made a proposition: why spend a projected $69-70 billion on an outdated rail that only tops-out at 116 miles per hour, when clearly the solution is to build something that's not a rail at all?!
So with the Hyperloop we eliminate a few factors that are sure to upset a few who are in Congress, but simultaneously it should bring a sigh of relief to the eskimos in Alaska, along with a few wealthy princes from Abu Dhabi.
Not that we're necessarily interested in helping-out a "few wealthy princes" from Dhabi, because God only knows that they have plenty of "help" from the massive, Ferrari theme park that they've built, but let's face it: no fossil fuels means no more punching holes into the earth.
On these key points, Elon Musk and I clearly agree with each other. However, we slightly disagree on one small factor, and that "factor" is not much more than vehicle type. To me, it doesn't seem like capsules are sufficient enough for a vacuum-based system that runs from downtown Los Angeles to San Francisco.
No comments:
Post a Comment